A- de 2010
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez
✓Claimant Adonay Ferrari Padilla Y Otra·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
- Improcedencia por pretender reabrir debate que podría incidir en investigaciones disciplinarias en sentencia T-709/09
- Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de Aclaración de la sentencia T-709/09.
Para la Sala, los argumentos de los peticionarios, esbozados para solicitar la aclaración, buscan reabrir el debate jurídico asumido en la sentencia referida y no a aclaraciones de conceptos o frases que ofrezcan motivo de duda contenidos en la parte resolutiva de la sentencia o que, encontrándose en las consideraciones de la providencia, influyan en ella.
Se decide RECHAZAR la solicitud formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud formulada por los ciudadanos Adonay Ferrar Padilla y Maria Victoria Quinones Triana, para que se aclare la sentencia T-709 de 2009.
- Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia a los interesados.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.