JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 29, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Ana Beatriz Méndez Gallardo Vs. Ministerio De Protección Social

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Santander, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Y El Juzgado Séptimo Penal Municipal De Depuración De Bucaramanga. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Acción De La Referencia Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Santander Para Que Adelante La Correspondiente Actuación Judicial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • No corresponde determinar a priori contra quienes debe dirigirse la acción
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por Ana Beatriz Mendez Gallardo contra el Ministerio de la Proteccion Social y la Junta Nacional de Calificacion de Invalidez, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Santander, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Septimo. Penal de Depuracion de Bucaramanga, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
  4. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.