JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 27, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Oscar Hernandez Castro·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela En Materia De Concurso Publico De Meritos De La Fiscalia General De La Nacion
  • Negar solicitud de desacato frente al cumplimiento de sentencia SU446/11 por falta de vacantes
Desacato
  • Medida de carácter coercitivo y sancionatorio
  • Configuración
  • Elementos
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Incidente de Desacato.

El memorialista solicitó a la Corporación iniciar un incidente de desacato contra la Comisión Nacional de Carrera de la Fiscalía General de la Nación, por incumplimiento de la sentencia SU446/11.

La Sala Plena estableció que no se configuraron los requisitos para la procedencia de la petición impetrada y en virtud de ello, decidió NEGAR la declaratoria de desacato.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional de la Republica de Colombia,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de declaratoria de desacato presentada por el doctor OSCAR HERNANDEZ CASTRO, contra la Fiscalia General de la Nacion, frente al cumplimiento de la Sentencia SU - 446 de 2011.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.