JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Julian Fernando Buchelli Aguirre

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Presidente De La Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura
  • Inaplicación del decreto 1382 de 2000 por existir vacío respecto a la competencia de superior funcional
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Sección Primera, Subsección “B”, que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela de la referencia, toda vez que ante el vacío del Decreto 1382 de 2000, es necesario acudir a las reglas generales previstas en el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, norma que señala lo siguiente: “Primera instancia.

Son competentes para conocer de la acción de tutela, a prevención, los jueces o tribunales con jurisdicción en el lugar donde ocurriere la violación o la amenaza que motivaren la presentación de la solicitud”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Ordenar al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Primera, Subseccion "B", que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.