JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 10, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Jose Aristides Andrade·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
  • Requisitos de procedencia
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-103/14.

Para el peticionario, la sentencia frente a la cual solicita la nulidad, es incongruente.

La Sala Plena considera, que lo que pretende el actor es reabrir un debate jurídico y probatorio ya finalizado, basándose en el reproche personal de lo que debió haber sido la decisión.

Para la Corporación, la posición asumida constituye un simple desacuerdo que carece de la fuerza necesaria para demostrar que la decisión adoptada fue producto de una evidente y manifiesta violación al debido proceso.

Se DENIEGA la solicitud.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. NEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-103 de 2014, proferida por la Sala Quinta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional. Proceda Secretaria General de esta Corporacion a notificar la presente decision a las partes del presente asunto, advirtiendo que contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Reporting justice
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Impedido
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Presidente
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Magistrado
✓
Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez
Magistrado
✓
Mauricio González Cuervo
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.