JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 6, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Edier Esteban Manco Pineda

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Súplica interpuesto contra el auto del 19 de octubre de 2012, dictado por el magistrado Nilson Pinilla Pinilla para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, por no haber realizado las exigencias hechas en el auto de inadmisión, para entender por corregida la demanda inicialmente presentada.

La Sala encuentra que en el auto de rechazo no se impusieron requisitos adicionales a los ya exigidos en el auto inadmisorio de la demanda como lo interpretó el actor en su recurso de súplica y, en tal sentido, decidió CONFIRMAR el auto suplicado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del diecinueve (19) de octubre de 2012, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Edier Esteban Manco Pineda, contra el inciso
  2. segundo. (parcial) del articulo
  3. primero. de la Ley 1258 de 2008 "Por medio de la cual se crea la sociedad por acciones simplificada"
  4. SEGUNDO. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.