JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 27, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Celestino Mojica Peña

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad De Ley Estatutaria
  • Carácter definitivo e integral y con efectos de cosa juzgada
Ley Estatutaria
  • Inconstitucional sobreviniente
  • Revisión constitucional
Proyecto De Ley Estatutaria
  • Competencia de la Corte Constitucional
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad En Materia De Doble Militancia
  • Rechazar recurso de súplica por existir cosa juzgada mediante sentencia C-490/11
7 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Súplica interpuesto en contra del auto proferido por la doctora María Victoria Calle Correa para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, por haberse producido el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada constitucional, en tanto la norma demandada ya había sido revisada de manera integral mediante la sentencia C-490/11.

La Sala encontró que en el presente caso no se dieron las condiciones necesarias para que se diera un nuevo pronunciamiento en relación con la norma demandada y en tal sentido decidió CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto proferido por la Magistrada Maria Victoria Calle Correa, veintiocho (28) de octubre de dos mil trece (2013), por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda instaurada por el ciudadano Celestino Mojica Pena.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.