JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 14, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido

✓Claimant Maria Lucia De Los Dolores Londoño·Respondent Uariv

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia De Tutela
  • Factor territorial
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado Séptimo Penal para Adolescentes de Medellín y el Juzgado Civil Laboral del Circuito de Yarumal.

La Corte decide respetar la voluntad del accionante y dirimir la controversia con la remisión del expediente al juzgado de Medellín, para que de forma inmediata continúe con el trámite de primera instancia y profiera decisión de fondo respecto del amparo solicitado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el auto del 2 de febrero del año 2017, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Séptimo. Penal para Adolescentes de Medellín (con funciones de conocimiento), mediante el cual se declaró incompetente para conocer de la acción de tutela presentada por María Lucía de los Dolores Londoño contra la UARIV.
  3. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado
  4. Séptimo. Penal para Adolescentes de Medellín (con funciones de conocimiento) para que, de forma inmediata, tramite la acción de tutela iniciada por María Lucía de los Dolores Londoño contra la UARIV.
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaría General, COMUNICAR al Juzgado Civil-Laboral del Circuito de Yarumal (Antioquia), la decisión adoptada en esta providencia.
  6. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Impedido
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Magistrado
✓
Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
Magistrado
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Magistrado
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
Iván Humberto Escrucería Mayolo
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Presidente
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.