JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 31, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Maria Smith Martinez Guido Vs. Tribunal Superior De San Gil

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre La Corte Suprema De Justicia Sala De Casacion Laboral Y El Juzgado 1 Penal Del Circuito De Velez Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Oficina De Reparto De Velez A Fin De Que Efectue El Reparto Entre Los Juzgados Civiles Del Circuito De Velez
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
  • Decisión administrativa de la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
Accion De Tutela Contra Entidades Descentralizadas Por Servicios Del Orden Nacional
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales en primera instancia
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por Maria Smith Martinez Guido contra el Tribunal Superior de San Gil a la Oficina Judicial de Reparto de Velez con el fin de que efectue el reparto entre Juzgados Civiles del Circuito de la ciudad de Velez.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Laboral y al Juzgado 1 Penal del Circuito de Velez, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
  3. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.