JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Maria Luz Romero De Salazar

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Jueces de distintos distritos judiciales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia surgido entre el Juzgado Segundo Civil del Circuito de Sincelejo y el Juzgado Quinto Civil del Circuito de Cartagena.

Por lo anterior, la Corte advierte que en este caso existe una norma aplicable, el inciso primero del Art. 28 del Código de Procedimiento Civil, el cual dice que “los conflictos de competencia que se susciten entre dos juzgados de distintos distritos judiciales, serán resueltos por la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Declarar que la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia surgido entre el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Sincelejo y el Juzgado
  3. Quinto. Civil del Circuito de Cartagena.
  4. Segundo. Ordenar que por Secretaria General, se envie el expediente a la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Reporting justice
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
Presidente
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
Read dissent
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.