JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 30, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Apoderado Judicial Del Señor Carlos Manuel

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto no se incurrió en ninguna de las causales invocadas
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-012/16.

El peticionario, sin especificar alguna causal de nulidad prevista por la jurisprudencia de la Corporación, argumentó que la Sala de Revisión al proferir el fallo de la referencia, incurrió en una ostensible, probada, significativa y trascendental violación a los principios-derechos al debido proceso y a la presunción de inocencia.

Al no hallarse acreditada ninguna de las causales invocadas, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió NEGAR la nulidad formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR LA NULIDAD formulada por senor Carlos Manuel en contra de la Sentencia T-012 de 2016, proferida por la Sala Novena de Revision de la Corte Constitucional.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comuniquese la presente providencia a las partes, con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.