JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 11, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Julia Del Carmen Mosquera Casas Y Otros Vs. Presidencia De La Republica Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo Del Choco Y El Juzgado Primero Laboral Del Circuito De Quibdo. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo Del Choco
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridades De Diferente Nivel
  • Competencia del juez de mayor jerarquía
Jurisdiccion Constitucional
  • No corresponde a quienes la ejercen determinar a priori contra quienes se dirige la acción de tutela
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. ORDENAR que por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, se REMITA al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Choco, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por las ciudadanas Julia del Carmen Mosquera Casas, Rosalba Denice Valencia Chamorro, Odila Cordoba Ortiz, Ana del carmen Cordoba Palacios y Loy Leyvi Sanchez Mosquera, contra la Presidencia de la Republica, el Ministerio de Comunicaciones y Colombia Telecomunicaciones S.A. E.P.S. para que, asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento del referido amparo constitucional.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Laboral del Circuito de Quibdo, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de ponerle en conocimiento sobre lo aqui decidido por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.