A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Hugo Ramon Martinez Arteaga Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por silencio del actor durante oportunidad procesal otorgada en el auto inadmisorio
- Notificación por estado
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
El rechazo de las demandas de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia se dio, en un caso, porque los accionantes no presentaron escrito de corrección y, en el otro, porque el demandante lo presentó de manea personal pero de forma extemporánea.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decide CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes la providencia recurrida.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del diez (10) de abril de dos mil dieciocho (2018), proferido por el despacho de la Magistrada Ponente en el proceso acumulado, expedientes D-12601 y D-12602, doctora Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, mediante el cual se rechazo las demandas presentadas por los ciudadanos Hugo Ramon Martinez Arteaga, Monica Lisbeth Palacios Grozo, Sandra Iveth Ortiz Gomez y Francisco Andres Manotas Polo contra el articulo 61 de la Ley 1753 de 2015.
- Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.