A- de 2007
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla
✓Claimant Mario Andres Zarama Bastidas
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Sala Plena puede disponer la acumulación de procesos incluidos para reparto
- Improcedencia por cuanto la solicitud se presentó después de realizado el reparto de los expedientes
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. No acceder a la solicitud de acumulacion formulada por el senor Mario Andres Zarama Bastidas.
- Segundo. Anexar a los expedientes D-6898 y D-6938 copia de este auto, para los efectos pertinentes.
- Tercero. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno, segun lo dispuesto en el articulo 47 del Acuerdo 05 de 1992.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.