JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 6, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Urbanizacion Santa Barbara Central Ltda·Respondent Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca Secc.3

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado a partir del auto proferido por la Sección Segunda, Subsección “B” del Consejo de Estado, dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por la Sociedad Urbanización Santa Barbara Central LTDA, a través de apoderado, contra el Instituto de Desarrollo Urbano IDU, toda vez que se le dio aplicación al Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000, que resultó inconstitucional.

En consecuencia, se remitió el expediente a la mencionada Sección para que realice el trámite correspondiente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado, a partir del auto del veintisiete (27) de febrero de 2001, proferido por la Seccion Segunda, Subseccion "B" del Consejo de Estado, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por la Sociedad Urbanizacion Santa Barbara Central LTDA, a traves de apoderado, contra el Instituto de Desarrollo Urbano IDU.
  2. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente por Secretaria General a la Seccion Segunda, Subseccion "B" del Consejo de Estado, para que se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite senalado en la parte motiva de esta decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.