JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 24, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Leoncia Delina Cortes Tuzo Vs. Gobierno Nacional, Ministerio De La Proteccion Social Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca Sala Disciplinaria Y El Juzgado Veintidos De Familia De Bogota. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura Sala Disciplinaria
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Leoncia Delina Cortes Tuzo, contra "el Gobierno Nacional, Ministerio de la Proteccion Social, Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico, Departamento de Cundinamarca, Beneficencia de Cundinamarca, Asamblea Departamental de Cundinamarca" y la agente liquidadora de cuentas.
  2. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Juzgado Veintidos de Familia de Bogota.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.