JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 21, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Traslado de información por Asociación Colombiana de Empresas Sociales del Estado y Hospitales Públicos a Superintendencia Nacional de Salud por presunta irregularida
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Dentro del trámite de seguimiento a la orden vigésima de la Sentencia T-760/08, se decide con el presente auto remitir a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, vía correo electrónico, la información allegada por la Asociación Colombiana de Empresas Sociales del Estado y Hospitales Públicos, para que la analice y adopte las medidas de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Remitir a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, via correo electronico, la informacion allegada por la Asociacion Colombiana de Empresas Sociales del Estado y Hospitales Publicos el 21 de octubre de 2013, para los fines indicados en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. La Secretaria General de esta Corporacion librara la comunicacion correspondiente, a la que adjuntara copia de este auto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.