JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 24, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Ingrid Catalina Kuan Marquez Vs. Jefatura De Apoyo A Tribunales, Direccion Ejecutiva Seccional De Administracion Judicial De Bogota - Cundinamarca

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca Y El Juzgado Octavo Penal Del Circuito De Bogota. Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura Sala Disciplinaria
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. ORDENAR que por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, se REMITA a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por la ciudadana Ingrid Catalina Kuan Marquez contra la Jefatura de Apoyo a Tribunales, Direccion Ejecutiva Seccional de Administracion Judicial de Bogota - Cundinamarca, para que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento del mismo.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General, COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Octavo. Penal del Circuito de Bogota lo resuelto en esta providencia, con el fin de poner en su conocimiento los fundamentos constitucionales y legales en virtud de los cuales se adopta la presente decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.