JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 24, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Efrain Alberto Rojas Arias Vs. Asobancaria Cifin

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Octavo Penal Municipal Con Funcion De Control De Garantias De Manizales Y El Juzgado Primero Administrativo Del Circuito De Manizales. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Octavo Penal Municipal Con Funcion De Control De Garantias De Manizales
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad particular
  • Competencia de Juez Municipal
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. PRIMERO. DESATAR el conflicto de competencia entre el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Penal Municipal con funcion de control de garantias de Manizales y el Juzgado
  3. Primero. Administrativo del Circuito de Manizales, dentro del tramite de la accion de tutela promovida por Efrain Alberto Rojas Arias contra Asobancaria Cifin, en el sentido de REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Juzgado
  4. Octavo. Penal Municipal con funcion de control de garantias de Manizales para que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento del referido amparo constitucional.
  5. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE la decision adoptada en esta providencia al Juzgado
  6. Primero. Administrativo del Circuito de Manizales, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.