A- de 2009
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
✓Claimant Andres Gomez Roldan Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por falta de legitimación
- Legitimación procesal
- Oportunidad para solicitarla por interviniente
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (3 points)
- En merito de lo expuesto, y con la debida autorizacion de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, el Suscrito Magistrado Sustanciador en ejercicio de sus facultades constitucionales y legales,
- RESUELVE
- Primero. DECLARAR improcedente la solicitud de recusacion contra los Magistrados Mauricio Gonzalez, Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto y Nilson Pinilla Pinilla, y contra la Magistrada Maria Victoria Calle, propuesta por el ciudadano Jose Leonardo Bueno Ramirez; y la presentada por los ciudadanos Andres Gomez Roldan y Elson Rafael Rodriguez contra los Magistrados Mauricio Gonzalez, Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, y contra la Magistrada Maria Victoria Calle; por falta de legitimidad de los ciudadanos recusantes, segun lo explicado en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.