JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 17, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Oscar Rico Calderon

✓
Topic · hard data
Incidente De Desacato De Las Órdenes Impartidas En La Sentencia T-293-09. La Sala Recuerda Que Solo En Casos Excepcionales Es Competente Para Conocer De Los Incidentes De Desacato, En Este Caso El Competente Es El Juzgado Ante El Cual Se Interpuso La Acción De Tutela. Rechaza.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derechos Fundamentales
  • Deber de las autoridades responsables del agravio o amenaza de acatar los fallos de tutela
Desacato
  • Naturaleza jurídica
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional y circunstancias para hacer cumplir directamente sus providencias
  • Incompetencia para promover cumplimiento de sentencia T-293/09 y tramitar incidente de desacato
Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Competencia para asegurar cumplimiento de fallo de tutela
  • Competencia de juzgado penal municipal con función de control de garantías para impulsar cumplimiento de sentencia T-293/09 y conocer incidente de desacato
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REMITIR al Juzgado 45 Penal Municipal de Bogotá con función de control de garantías, la solicitud contentiva del incidente de desacato propuesto con relación a la Sentencia T-293 de 2009.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al señor Oscar Rico Calderón, de la remisión de su solicitud al Juzgado 45 Penal Municipal de Bogotá con función de control de garantías, por ser este despacho el competente para conocer del incidente propuesto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.