JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 10, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Tramite De Urgencia Nacional De La Demanda Contra El Codigo Electoral, Para Que Fuera Fallada Antes De Los Comicios Del 28 De Octubre De 2007, Solicitud Que Fue Apoyada Por El Procurador General De La Nacion En Su Concepto. La Sala Plena Considero Que En Este Caso No Se Reunen Las Condiciones Que Ameritan El Tramite De Urgencia Nacional. Rechaza La Solicitud
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Rechaza solicitud trámite de urgencia nacional contra demanda de inconstitucionalidad del Código Electoral
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. RECHAZAR la solicitud de trámite de urgencia nacional que en el asunto de la referencia fue presentada por los ciudadanos Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes, Natalia Carolina Sandoval Rojas, Pedro Santana Rodríguez y Omar Hernández y disponer que, en consecuencia, el proceso siga su curso de acuerdo con el procedimiento y con los términos previstos en la Constitución y en la ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.