JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 3, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-281/19 formulada por el representante legal de la sociedad Nuevo Cauca S.A.S.

Luego de analizar la argumentación del peticionario, la Corte decidió RECHAZAR la aclaración rogada, porque no encontró elementos en los que se demostrara que hay elementos de duda en la parte resolutiva del precitado fallo.

Además, porque verificó que la postura del memorialista únicamente aludió a hechos que sobrevienen a la emisión de la providencia, que no sugieren una duda sobre las medidas adoptadas por la Corporación en dicha decisión y que solo demuestran una controversia sobre su cumplimiento.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-281 de 2019, presentada por la sociedad Nuevo Cauca S.A.S.
  2. Tercero. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al peticionario, con la advertencia de que contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.