JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 7, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Apoderado Judicial Del Banco Cafetero En Liquidacion·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Nulidad y adición de la sentencia T-076/10.

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena DENIEGA la solicitud de nulidad impetrada, al considerar que la petición no contuvo los mínimos presupuestos para la construcción de un cargo de nulidad por cambio del precedente jurisprudencial.

La petición de adición de la sentencia también se DENIEGA por no observarse en ella la ocurrencia de omisión alguna.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de adicion de la sentencia T-076 de 2010, proferida en febrero 11 de 2010 por la Sala Sexta de Revision.
  2. Segundo. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-076 de 2010, proferida en febrero 11 de 2010 por la Sala Sexta de Revision
  3. Tercero. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceNilson Pinilla PinillaConcurrenceGabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.