JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 15, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Margarita Tarapués Vs. El Municipio De Cali

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Susctitado Entre El Juzgado 15 Penal Municipal Con Funciones De Control De Garantías, El Juzgado Cuarto Penal Del Circuito De Cali Y El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Cali. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Cuarto Penal Del Circuito De Cali Para Que Tramite Y Decida La Acción De Que Se Trata.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia Juzgado Penal del Circuito
  • Lugar donde ocurriere la violación o amenaza
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Penal del Circuito de Cali, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Margarita Tarapues contra el Municipio de Cali, el Director de Dagma, el Director de la CVC y la Gerente de Emsirva ESP.
  3. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cali, Sala de Decision Penal y al Juzgado Quince Penal Municipal con Funciones de Control de Garantias de Cali.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.