JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 6, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Camilo Tarquino Gallegoy Otros·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Legitimacion Por Activa E Incidente De Nulidad
  • Proposición por parte o tercero afectado con órdenes proferidas en sede de revisión
Nulidad Contra Sentencias Proferidas Por Salas De Revision
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Reiteración de jurisprudencia
  • Solicitud dentro de los tres días siguientes a la notificación del fallo
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad.

Los memorialistas proponen un incidente de nulidad de la sentencia T-1028/10 basados en varias argumentaciones y la Sala no encuentra que éstas encuadren en ninguna de las causales de nulidad admitidas por la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional y considera además, que sólo se deben a que los solicitantes no comparten el sentido de la sentencia referida y por ello pretenden reabrir el debate jurídico.

Se DENIEGA por extemporánea la solicitud de nulidad presentada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR, por extemporanea, la nulidad de la sentencia T-1028 de 2010 proferida por la Sala Octava de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.