JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 3, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Andres Felipe Muñoz Y Otros Vs. Federacion Nacional De Patinaje

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Cincuenta Y Uno Civil Municipal De Bogota Y El Juzgado Catorce Civil Municipal De Cali. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Cincuenta Y Uno Civil Municipal De Bogota
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia
  • Libertad del actor para elegir el juez cuando varios resulten competentes de acuerdo al lugar donde se tramite la solicitud
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. ORDENAR que por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, se REMITA al Juzgado Cincuenta y Uno Civil Municipal de Bogota, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por los ciudadanos Andres Felipe Munoz Franco, Carolina Upegui Quevedo, Nicolas Antonio Zamudio Avila, Antonio Ruales Ceron, Julian Arboleda Zuleta, Yeny Carolina Arango Moreno, Carlos Esteban Perez Canabal, Eudes Alfonso Diazgranados Avendano y Cristian David Diazgranado contra la Federacion Nacional de Patinaje para que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento del mismo.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado Catorce Civil Municipal de Cali, lo resuelto en esta providencia con el fin de ponerle en conocimiento los fundamentos constitucionales y legales en virtud de los cuales se adopta la presente decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.