JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Eddie Armando Magnoler Rojas Vs. Corte Suprema De Justicia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Superior De Bogota, Sala Penal, Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca, Seccion Tercera Subseccion A Y La Corte Suprema De Justicia, Sala Penal De Conjueces. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bogota, Sala Penal
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior
Derecho De Acceso A La Administración De Justicia
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá
Accion De Tutela Contra Acto Administrativo De La Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Nombramiento y acceso al servicio público por méritos
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. Declarar competente para conocer la acción de tutela de Eddie Armando Magnoler Rojas contra la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogotá, Sala Penal y por lo tanto ORDENAR la remisión del expediente para su conocimiento a dicho Tribunal.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.