JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 24, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Jaime Oswaldo Quevedo Parra

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Reiteración de improcedencia
  • Procedencia por presentación dentro del término de ejecutoria
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
Sentencia De Constitucionalidad En Materia Penal
  • Rechazar solicitud de aclaración de sentencia C-209/07 por extemporánea
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia C-209/07.

El memorialista pide específicamente, que se aclare si dentro de la solicitud de audiencia del fiscal de preclusión, las víctimas pueden solicitar testimonios, pruebas de referencia y prueba pericial.

Luego de verificar que la petición de aclaración se presentó por fuera del término de ejecutoria de la providencia, la Sala Plena decide RECHAZARLA por extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaracion presentada por el senor Jaime Oswaldo Quevedo Jara respecto de la sentencia C-209 de 2007.
  2. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.