JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 20, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Julio Enrique Mogollon Gonzalez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda A Ley Estatutaria De Administracion De Justicia
  • Confirmar rechazo por haber hecho tránsito a cosa juzgada constitucional
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto proferido por la Magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, en razón al efecto de la cosa juzgada de la sentencia C-037/96, que estudió la constitucionalidad del proyecto de ley que posteriormente fuera sancionado como Ley 270/96.

La Sala Plena decide confirmar la decisión impugnada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del veinticuatro (24) de julio de dos mil catorce (2014), mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Julio Enrique Mogollón González, en contra del inciso 1º del artículo 54 de la Ley 270 de 1996, "Estatutaria de la Administración de Justicia".
  2. SEGUNDO. ARCHÍVESE el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.