JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Kalebt Burgos Pasco Vs. Direccion Seccional De Fiscalias De Cartagena Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cartagena, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Y El Juzgado Quinto De Familia De Cartagena. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cartagena
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra La Direccion Seccional De Fiscalias
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Derecho De Peticion
  • Supuesta vulneración por falta de respuesta clara y de fondo a solicitud de copias del expediente de proceso penal
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, en ejercicio de sus atribuciones constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, REMITASE el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Kalebt Burgos Pasco contra la Direccion Seccional de Fiscalias de Cartagena al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cartagena para que la tramite en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.