A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
✓Claimant William Florez Noriega
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por improcedente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración del Auto 162/17 que rechazó, por improcedente, el incidente de nulidad formulado contra la sentencia SU.406/16.
Concluye la Corte que la petición formulada no persigue la aclaración de frases o conceptos contenidos en la parte resolutiva del auto en mención o que, incluidos en su parte motiva, generen duda o ambigüedad ocasionando dificultad en la comprensión de la decisión adoptada.
En consecuencia, se RECHAZA, por improcedente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaración del Auto 162 de 2017, presentada por William Flórez Noriega, en calidad de apoderado judicial de Médicos Asociados S.A.
- SEGUNDO. COMUNÍQUESE la presente providencia al peticionario, advirtiéndose que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.