JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 24, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Marcos Quiroz Gutierrez·Respondent Ley 1563 De 2012

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica presentado en contra del auto mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de la referencia, porque el magistrado sustanciador consideró que el actor no corrigió su escrito en los términos indicados en el auto inadmisorio.

La Sala Plena considera que el recurso no está llamado a prosperar, porque no se logra una adecuada presentación del concepto de violación.

Conforme a lo anterior, se confirma el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del catorce (14) de mayo de dos mil quince (2015), que rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Marcos Quiroz Gutierrez contra el numeral 1o del articulo 41 de la Ley 1563 de 2012, "Por medio de la cual se expide el Estatuto de Arbitraje Nacional e Internacional y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.