JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Antonio Laitano Leal Vs. Fiscalia General De La Nacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Laboral Del Circuito De Cartagena Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cartagena, Sala Disciplinaria. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cartagena, Sala Disciplinaria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Fiscalia General De La Nacion
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Corte Constitucional
  • Remisión de expediente para que se de trámite a la acción de tutela
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar que el juez competente en la acción de tutela instaurada por Antonio Laietano Leal contra la Fiscalía General de la Nación -Dirección Seccional Administrativa y Financiera de la Fiscalía Seccional de Cartagena es el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cartagena, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, y en consecuencia ORDENAR la remisión del expediente de la referencia a dicho despacho para su trámite.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.