JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 8, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Nelson Antonio Mayorga Quevedo Vs. La Coordinadora Del Programa Familias En Acción Del Municipio De Yopal

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Primero Promiscuo Municipal De Yopal, El Tribunal Administrativo De Casanare Y El Juzgado Único Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Yopal Casanare. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Primero Promiscuo Municipal De Yopal A Fin De Que Tramite Y Decida La Acción En Cuestión
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de Juez Promiscuo Municipal
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento directo de conflictos de competencia para garantizar derechos fundamentales
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ORDENAR al Juzgado
  2. Primero. Promiscuo Municipal de Yopal (Casanare), que de forma inmediata, asuma el conocimiento de la solicitud de proteccion constitucional de la referencia conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, comuniquese a los despachos judiciales en colision la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.