A- de 2005
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Carlos Edurdo Corssi Y Otros·Respondent ..
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se rechaza por falta de legitimación
- Elaboración prólogo de libro
- Rechazar por impertinente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusación formulada en contra del magistrado Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa.
Analizados los argumentos de los peticionarios encontró la Corte que no corresponden a ninguna de las causales de impedimento o recusación previstas para los procesos de constitucionalidad en los artículos 25 y 26 del Decreto Ley 2067 de 1991.
Con base en lo anterior, la Sala Plena de la Corporación declaró la IMPERTINENCIA de las recusaciones deprecadas.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
- R E S U E LV E
- Declarar la impertinencia de las recusaciones formuladas en este proceso en escrito separado, por los ciudadanos Carlos Eduardo Corssi Otalora, Margarita Rueda, Luis Rueda Gomez y Luis Gomez Acevedo, contra el Magistrado Manuel Jose Cepeda Espinosa.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.