JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 25, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Adolfo Tafur Nader

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se abstuvo de resolver el conflicto negativo de competencia y en consecuencia remitir el expediente a la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, para que defina cuál de los dos Tribunales Administrativos es competente para conocer de la acción de tutela incoada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Subdirección de prestaciones económicas de la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Abstenerse de resolver el conflicto negativo de competencia.
  2. Segundo. Remitir el expediente a la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, para que ella defina cual de los dos Tribunales Administrativos es competente para conocer de la accion de tutela incoada por el senor ADOLFO TAFUR NADER , contra la Subdireccion de prestaciones economicas de la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.