JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 13, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Miguel Ángel Villalobos Sabogal Contra Procuraduria General De La Nación.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca Y El Juzgado Octavo De Familia De Bogotá. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca Seccion Cuarta Subseccion B
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Discrepancia sobre la naturaleza jurídica de la entidad demandada
Providencias De La Corte Constitucional
  • Tendría efectos inter pares donde se inaplique Decreto 1382 de 2000
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridades De Diferente Nivel
  • Competencia del juez de mayor jerarquía
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Cuarta Subseccion B para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela presentada por el senor Miguel Angel Villalobos Sabogal contra la Procuraduria Regional de Cundinamarca, la Procuraduria Primera Delegada para la Contratacion Estatal y la Procuraduria General de la Nacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.