JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 20, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recusación formulada por la ciudadana Vilma Graciela Martínez contra los integrantes de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional.

Luego de observar que la peticionaria intenta reabrir el debate sobre supuestas situaciones que afectan la independencia de la Corte Constitucional en su integridad, pues alcanza a la Secretaría General de la Corporación y a los conjueces de la misma y, teniendo en cuenta que igual pretensión fue resuelta por la Corporación en otras providencias, la dispone ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en el Auto 105A/21.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela