JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 1, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Gisela Quimbaya Reyes Vs. Presidencia De La República Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Tribunal Superior De Distrito Judicial De Neiva, Sal Civil-Familia-Laboral Y El Juzgado Tercero Administrativo De Neiva. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Acción De La Referencia A La Sala Citado Del Tribunal Superior De Distrito Judicial De Neiva.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • No corresponde determinar a priori contra quienes debe dirigirse la acción
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia Sala Civil Familia Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, REMITASE el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por la ciudadana Gisela Quimbaya Reyes contra la Presidencia de la Republica, Ministerio de la Proteccion Social (FONVIVIENDA), Ministerio de Educacion, Gobernacion del Tolima, Alcaldia Municipal de Ibague, Secretaria de Salud Departamental y Municipal, Accion Social, Sena, Bancoldex e Incoder al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Neiva, Sala Civil-Familia-Laboral para que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento del asunto.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Tercero. Administrativo del Circuito de Neiva, lo resuelto en esta providencia con el fin de ponerle en conocimiento los fundamentos constitucionales y legales en virtud de los cuales se adopta la presente decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.