JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 11, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Julio Cesar Ariza Pinilla·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
  • Reiteración de improcedencia
  • Procedencia por presentación dentro del término de ejecutoria
Accion De Tutela En Materia Pensional
  • Rechazar solicitud de aclaración de sentencia T-712/11 por extemporánea
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-712/11.

La Sala encuentra que la petición de aclaración formulada es extemporánea y por ello decide RECHAZARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por extemporanea la solicitud de aclaracion de sentencia T-712 de 2011, formulada por el ciudadano Julio Cesar Ariza Pinilla.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.