A- de 2020
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
✓Claimant Diana Marcela Ortiz Tovar
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por extemporáneo
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque los defectos identificados en la decisión de inadmisión no fueron subsanados en el escrito de corrección.
Luego de verificar que el actor formuló el recurso de forma extemporánea, se rechazó el mismo y, en consecuencia, se CONFIRMÓ el auto cuestionado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR POR EXTEMPORANEO el recurso de suplica formulado por la ciudadana Diana Marcela Ortiz Tovar contra el Auto del 2 de junio de 2020, proferido por el Magistrado Sustanciador Alejandro Linares Cantillo, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad promovida contra el articulo 101 de la Ley 2010 de 2019.
- SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision a la recurrente, indicandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.