JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 14, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Sin Información·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para asegurar el cumplimiento del fallo en asuntos de gran trascendencia social
Juez
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
Accion De Tutela Contra Banco Cafetero En Liquidacion Y Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Competencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia para abrir incidente de desacato de sentencia T-076/10
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-076 de 2010.

Se recuerda que es el juez de primera instancia el competente para hacer cumplir el fallo, y en este caso no se advierte la necesidad de que esta corporación adopte la tramitación del incidente de desacato, por lo tanto se resuelve no asumir la petición de iniciar el incidente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR la petición de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada por el señor José Tomás Abril Saboyá.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR a la Sala Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-076 de 2010, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  3. Tercero. INFORMAR al solicitante esta decisión, por intermedio de la Secretaría General de esta corporación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.