JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 14, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Julio Humberto Melendez Boada·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Nulidad
  • Improcedencia en procesos que se adelantan ante la Corte Constitucional
Accion De Tutela Contra El Consejo Superior De La Carrera Notarial
  • Deniega solicitud de nulidad de sentencia T-528/09 por no demostrar desconocimiento de precedentes jurisprudenciales
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia de la referencia.

La Corte observa que lo pretendido por el demandante es que se reabra el debate fáctico y probatorio ya realizado por la Sala de Revisión, siendo ostensible que en la sentencia cuestionada fueron apropiadamente estudiadas y apreciadas las circunstancias y los medios probatorios presentados, además no demuestra que se haya incurrido en desconocimiento de los precedentes jurisprudenciales, se concluye que la Sala Séptima de Revisión al proferir la sentencia acusada no incurrió en las causales invocadas por el peticionario por lo tanto se decide denegar la solicitud de nulidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-528 de 2009, proferida en agosto 5 de 2009 por la entonces Sala Septima de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.