JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 19, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Xenia Del Carmen Franco Pinto Vs. Comision Nacional Del Servicio Civil

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Primero Penal Del Circuito De Cartagena Y El Juzgado Tercero Administrativo De Cartagena. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Administrativo De Cartagena
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra La Comision Nacional Del Servicio Civil
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura en primera instancia
  • Competencia del Tribunal Administrativo
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Aplicación
  • Inaplicación
  • Efectos inter pares a su inaplicación
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Conflicto De Competencia Aparente
  • Competencia de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
Conflicto De Competencia
  • Aplicación de la excepción de inconstitucionalidad con efectos inter pares
6 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Administrativo de Cartagena, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comuniquese a los Juzgados
  3. Primero. Penal del Circuito y Juzgado
  4. Tercero. Administrativo de Cartagena, lo aqui resuelto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.