JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 14, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Volmar Perez Ortiz

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-319/10.

La precitada petición la formuló el Defensor del Pueblo a través de una serie de preguntas.

Observó la Sala Plena de la Corporación que los interrogantes formulados se dirigen a obtener un pronunciamiento sobre hipótesis que no derivan directamente de la disposición demandada y que lo que se pretende realmente no es que el fallo sea aclarado, sino que la Corte resuelva diversos interrogantes en relación con los efectos de la sentencia frente al concurso de méritos que actualmente adelanta la Defensoría del Pueblo.

Con base en lo anterior, se RECHAZA por improcedente la aclaración deprecada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente, la solicitud formulada por el ciudadano Volmar Perez Ortiz para que se aclare la sentencia C- 319 de 2010.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia al interesado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.