JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 28, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Maria Orfanery Ocampo Bedoya.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Alcance
Corte Constitucional
  • Inaplicación del precepto constitucional
  • No puede arrogarse competencias para llenar vacíos legislativos
  • Organo aplicador de la Constitución
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Inaplicación
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Autoridad Competente Para Resolver Conflictos De Competencia Entre Distintas Jurisdicciones
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Conocimiento para resolverlo debe ser expreso
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Posición jurídica del individuo o del funcionario público
Principio Del Juez Natural
  • Alcance
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir la tutela propuesta por la ciudadana de la referencia contra la Empresa de Acueducto y Alcantarillado de Pereira S.A. “E.S.P.” “Aguas y Aguas de Pereira”, al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Risaralda, por ser ese el despacho judicial ante el cual se interpuso la acción de tutela inicialmente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ORDENASE REMITIR la accion de tutela propuesta por la ciudadana Maria Orfanery Ocampo Bedoya, contra la Empresa de Acueducto y Alcantarillado de Pereira S.A. "E.S.P." "Aguas y Aguas de Pereira", al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Risaralda, por ser ese el despacho judicial ante el cual se interpuso la accion de tutela en referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Reporting justice
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Presidente
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
Read dissent
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.