A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
✓Claimant Comision Colombiana De Juristas
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se rechaza por cuanto es improcedente cualquier recurso contra un auto de la Sala Plena que resuelve una solicitud de nulidad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
La Comisión Nacional de Juristas solicitó la declaratoria de nulidad del Auto 666/17 que a su vez resolvió peticiones de nulidad formuladas contra la Sentencia C-332/17.
La Corte considera que la solicitud es manifiestamente improcedente y por eso la RECHAZA de plano.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. Rechazar la solicitud de nulidad procesal del Auto 666 de 2017, mediante el cual se decidieron las solicitudes de nulidad formuladas en contra de la Sentencia C-332 de 2017.
- SEGUNDO. Advertir que contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.