JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 8, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Hugo Alberto Torres Rubiano

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Inaplicación para el caso cuando el demandado es el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó al Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito de Garzón (Huila) asumir de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Huila, por ser ésta la autoridad judicial a quien fue repartido inicialmente el asunto.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Ordenar al Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Garzon (Huila) asumir de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela presentada por el senor Hugo Alberto Torres Rubiano, contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Huila.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.