JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 23, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ronald Alfonso Barboza Cortes Vs. Fondo De Prevision Social Del Congreso De La Republica

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Quinto Laboral Del Circuito De Cartagena Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Bolivar Sala De Decision. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Quinto Laboral Del Circuito De Cartagena
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra El Fondo De Prevision Social Del Congreso
  • Conocimiento de juez laboral del Circuito
  • Remisión expediente para su trámite bajo el apremio de los términos legales
Accion De Tutela Contra Entidades Descentralizadas Por Servicios Del Orden Nacional
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales en primera instancia
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado 5deg Laboral del Circuito de Cartagena, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la accion de tutela de Ronald Alfonso Barboza Cortes contra el Fondo de Prevision Social del Congreso de la Republica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.